If you feel more comfortable meeting with me in the presence of a lawyer, bring the lawyer when you peacefully meet with me. Do NOT take any actions through third parties, unwilling to thoroughly explain what they’re doing before hand, and show a Financial Power of Attorney to speak for the person they’re representing. If I haven’t contacted you, I am NOT asking for your help! Beware, you can be sued/jailed for coercing or forcing me into actions.
note: You are meeting with, and speaking to a 63 year old, college educated woman, a pre-law major from LIU, a New York University, who additionally has a two year paralegal degree. I’ve been married for 25 years. I’ve traveled abroad to various countries, and worked from age 16 – 59. My husband and I lived and worked in New York City for over a decade, ending five months after 9-11-2001. We are registered survivors of 9-11, where my husband’s final job in NYC ended with months feeding rescue workers at Ground Zero. I owned a small business for 12 years. I am now retired and collecting social security.
TO THE PEOPLE IVE WRITTEN PRIVATE LETTERS OR EMAILS TO REQUESTING A MEETING:
First, I’d like to wish everyone a heartfelt thank you, for attempting to create solutions to a difficult situation after I was slandered, and defamation occurred. Speaking to me directly is what I’d suggest moving forward. If you haven’t seen my husband and I associating with a third party spreading rumors, and stirring up controversy it’s because we don’t know that person! Know that I brought my issues to court, before a judge & they were dismissed with no further action requested/required by the judge! Note, I can’t afford to break the law or commit a felony crime. I will NOT participate in marriage fraud, paternity fraud, romance scams, unexplained or undocumented monies, verbal ‘take one’ scams from 3rd parties unwilling to speak to me in person\offer philanthropy directly, contract fraud on gvt/state monies, boyfriend scams, etc. Keep it real & legal, according to the law. Philanthropy is legal. Friendship is legal. Legal help: offering a lawyer is legal. Phoning me or writing me is legal. Coercion to sign on something I can’t view first in writing, or show to my husband of 25 years, is not! Holding me accountable for dismissed court cases, is not. Surprising things on me, that you’re unwilling to explain, is not! Coercing me into ‘strange games’, is not. Coercing me to ‘call-out’ and agree to take undocumented 3rd parties monies in banks, or in investment companies, is not! Allowing unlawful search and seizure of my internet or cell phone, is not; it’s a crime. Forcing me to talk about my sex life, previous boyfriends, previous husbands, is not; it’s a hate crime! Obstruction of justice regarding reported crime, is a crime. Why you’re afraid to speak to another US Citizen, stand up for another US Citizen, is totally perplexing.
Happy New Year,
Karen Wickman. https://karen-wickman.blog/
Terms visible in writing PRIOR to agreeing to sign! No hidden clauses. A chance to bring the contract agreement down to a lawyer of your choice for review. That’s the law.
If you say there is an elephant in the room, you mean that there is an obvious problem or difficult situation that people do not want to talk about. It’s why I brought my issues to court! In my situation, no one appears to be interested in addressing what 3rd parties are inciting #OutsideOfCourt. My statement:
I NEED TO KNOW who was spreading rumors & slander about me, and organizing all kinds of ‘surprise scenarios’ all over town, without my permission. Who was doing that? Why would someone spread false & misleading information about me, and/or personal information they shouldn’t know about me, and then personally attack me #OutsideOfCourt ?
If this was a joke, please tell me! A “Romance Scam” is a serious federal crime! Below is a genuine grand jury indictment.
MY CASE NOTES:
The Law Regarding Contracts: no where in this law does it state: ‘call out’, ‘take one’, or ‘ just say it’.
CA CIVIL CODE – CIV
TITLE 2. MANNER OF CREATING CONTRACTS [1619 – 1633] ( Title 2 enacted 1872. )
1624. (a) The following contracts are invalid, unless they, or some note or memorandum thereof, are in writing and subscribed by the party to be charged or by the party’s agent:
(1) An agreement that by its terms is not to be performed within a year from the making thereof. (Or cannot be performed within a year: ie: marriage, paternity)
(2) A special promise to answer for the debt, default, or miscarriage of another, except in the cases provided for in Section 2794. (ie: philanthropy, bankruptcy help)
(7) A contract, promise, undertaking, or commitment to loan money or to grant or extend credit, in an amount greater than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), not primarily for personal, family, or household purposes, made by a person engaged in the business of lending or arranging for the lending of money or extending credit. For purposes of this section, a contract, promise, undertaking, or commitment to loan money secured solely by residential property consisting of one to four dwelling units shall be deemed to be for personal, family, or household purposes.
As always, I’m happy to speak with anybody willing to introduce themselves, (first and last names if I don’t know you), and willing to admit they’ve heard rumors or slander about me. (Open discussions from there regarding any other topic that’s concerning my husband and myself, or you are on the table.) Friends and legal advisors are welcome. Any discussion of money or contracts by law must be according to the below:
The Statute of Frauds, codified in California Civil Code section 1624, requires certain contracts to be in writing, with specific requirements placed in the document (see above link), and each party must be allowed to review that contract, as well as have a lawyer of their choice to review that document PRIOR to signing; by law, seven days are allowed for review with an attorney of our choice! My husband of 25 years, and myself are the only two parties who can sign for us, and Federal Bankruptcy Rule 9019 before the Eastern District Bankruptcy Court in Modesto is required with the designated Administrator & Judge assigned to our case. The above law(s) ‘are what they are’, and my husband and I are not interested in circumventing the law, being coerced into signing or agreeing to signing a document we haven’t seen.
‘Financial Fraud‘ Crime Report – Reported to FBI & FTC